A mark, a yen, a buck, or a pound,
A buck or a pound, a buck or a pound
Is all that makes the world go around,
Can make the world go ’round.
Money makes the world go around,
The world go around, the world go around
Money makes the world go around.
It makes the world go ’round.
~Cabaret, 1966
Ohio media outlets regularly publicize the enormous amount of campaign dollars John Ka$ich has compared to his challenger Ed FitzGerald. News stories are being written as if the gubernatorial race is already over, since FitzGerald probably cannot come up with the funds needed to compete with the magnitude of money being funneled into the governor’s re-election campaign.
Does having more money than his opponent really make John Ka$ich a better candidate for governor?
FitzGerald campaign spokesperson Lauren Hitt said it’s not realistic to expect him to have raised the same amount of money as Ka$ich. “There’s no doubt that Ed is different from any candidate who has run for governor in the last couple of cycles. He certainly does not have the connections that John Ka$ich has, but that is also what makes him an appealing candidate, as someone who is going to be able to work for the middle class and make Ohio work for everybody, not just the wealthy and well-connected,” Hitt said.
The Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling opened the floodgates for corporations to directly spend unlimited money in politics, which allowed “Super PACs” to spend millions on campaign ads benefiting Republican candidates like Governor Ka$ich. The Ohio governor is an American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) alumnus who has solicited campaign money from all over the country, including the Republican Governors Association (RGA.)
In 2010, the RGA spent more than $11 million on TV ads and mailers to help elect Ka$ich, and judging by its political attack ads launched against FitzGerald, it appears that the RGA is actively protecting its investment in 2014. The RGA’s primary mission, according to its website, “is to help elect Republicans to governorships throughout the nation, but we are also dedicated to providing our governors with the resources to help them govern effectively.”
Might “providing governors with resources” come in the form of a corporate-friendly ALEC agenda accompanied by its model legislation?
According to Common Cause, Ka$ich received multiple campaign contributions from corporations belonging to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) in 2010- not counting all of the contributions from the RGA. ALEC supporters also donated to the RGA, such as the $1 million chunk of change that came directly from David Koch. It would appear that Gov. Ka$ich’s re-election is heavily supported by the Koch brothers, since Koch money is the RGA’s top source for contributions. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Republican_Governors_Association
Money definitely makes John Ka$ich’s world go ‘round, but can Ohioans really afford to spend another four years with a governor whose world revolves around ALEC?
Vote for Ed FitzGerald, the candidate whose world revolves around making Ohio work for everybody, not just the wealthy and well-connected.
Remember in November.
Think.